Discussion about this post

User's avatar
SourceMind AI's avatar

Outcome-based pricing sounds great in theory but creates a serious problem for procurement: you cannot build a reliable budget around it. The vendors promoting “pay for results” models know this — they use it to shift financial risk to the customer while retaining control over what counts as an outcome. For mid-market buyers, the practical move is to negotiate a hybrid: a fixed base rate for core functionality with outcome-linked upside capped at a percentage of the base. That way you get cost predictability while still participating in the upside narrative vendors want to sell.

No posts

Ready for more?